Aortic arch anomalies in pediatric patients: anatomic characteristics, associated malformations, and factors associated with surgical intervention at a national referral center in Peru, 2015–2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59594/iicqp.2026.v4n2.177Keywords:
Aorta, Thoracic, Computed Tomography Angiography, Heart Defects, Congenital, Thoracic SurgeryAbstract
Objective: To identify the types of aortic arch anomalies, describe associated congenital heart defects and extracardiac malformations, and evaluate factors associated with surgical intervention in pediatric patients treated at the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño San Borja during 2015–2024.
Methods: This was a retrospective observational study with an association analysis. Patients with aortic arch anomalies identified by cardiac computed tomography angiography were included. Demographic, anatomic, and clinical variables were recorded. Bivariate analyses and Firth's penalized multivariable logistic regression were performed, and crude odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were estimated with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
Results: A total of 92 patients were included. The median age was 3 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–168 months). The left aortic arch was the most frequent configuration (52.2%), followed by the right aortic arch (44.6%). Hypoplasia was the most common obstructive abnormality (33.7%). Complex congenital heart disease was identified in 53.3% of patients and conotruncal congenital heart disease in 44.6%. Extracardiac malformations were observed in 52.2% of patients, with bronchopulmonary abnormalities being the most frequent (34.8%). Surgical intervention was recorded in 62.0% of cases. In the bivariate analysis, complex congenital heart disease, conotruncal congenital heart disease, and major obstructive aortic arch abnormalities were associated with surgical intervention. In the multivariable analysis, complex congenital heart disease (aOR = 3.98; 95% CI: 1.27–12.47; p = 0.018) and major obstructive aortic arch abnormalities (aOR = 8.16; 95% CI: 1.35–49.22; p = 0.022) remained independently associated with surgical intervention.
Conclusions: In this group of patients, the left aortic arch was the most frequent anatomic configuration, and hypoplasia was the most common obstructive abnormality of the aortic arch. Complex congenital heart disease and extracardiac malformations were frequent findings. Complex congenital heart disease and major obstructive aortic arch abnormalities were independently associated with surgical intervention.
Downloads
References
1. Backer CL, Rigsby CK, Mavroudis C. Vascular rings and pulmonary artery sling. En: Mavroudis C, Backer CL, editores. Pediatric cardiac surgery. 5.ª ed. Chichester (Reino Unido): Wiley-Blackwell; 2023. p. 225-47. doi: 10.1002/9781119282327.ch12
2. Asir M, Brennan K, Heraghty J, Hurn A, Jogeesvaran H, Moriarty G, et al. Vascular rings in the current era: is this a new disease requiring a new approach? Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2026;111(1):23-31. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327517
3. van der Linde D, Konings EEM, Slager MA, Witsenburg M, Helbing WA, Takkenberg JJM, et al. Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(21):2241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.025
4. McElhinney DB, Clark BJ 3rd, Weinberg PM, Kenton ML, McDonald-McGinn D, Driscoll DA, et al. Association of chromosome 22q11 deletion with isolated anomalies of aortic arch laterality and branching. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(8):2114-9. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01286-4
5. Weinberg PM. Aortic arch anomalies. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(4):633-43. doi: 10.1080/10976640600713756
6. Epstein R, Yomogida M, Donovan D, Butensky A, Aidala AA, Farooqi KM, et al. Trends in cardiac CT utilization for patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease: a multicenter survey study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024;18(3):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.02.002
7. Francone M, Gimelli A, Budde RPJ, Caro-Dominguez P, Einstein AJ, Gutberlet M, et al. Radiation safety for cardiovascular computed tomography imaging in paediatric cardiology: a joint expert consensus document of the EACVI, ESCR, AEPC, and ESPR. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23(8):e279-89. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac048
8. Hanneman K, Newman B, Chan F. Congenital variants and anomalies of the aortic arch. Radiographics. 2017;37(1):32-51. doi: 10.1148/rg.2017160033
9. Priya S, Thomas R, Nagpal P, Sharma A, Steigner M. Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2018;8(Suppl 1):S26-44. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.10.15
10. Razon Y, Berant M, Fogelman R, Amir G, Birk E. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of right aortic arch without significant intracardiac anomaly. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(12):1352-8. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.08.003
11. Ibáñez-Correa LM, Victoria S, Hurtado-Villa P. Prevalencia de cardiopatías congénitas en una cohorte de 54.193 nacimientos entre 2011-2017. Rev Colomb Cardiol. 2021;28(1):53-9. doi: 10.24875/RCCAR.M21000009
12. Lacunza Paredes RO, Sembrera Palacios E. Serie de casos de arco aórtico derecho: aproximación diagnóstica prenatal. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet. 2022;68(1). doi: 10.31403/rpgo.v68i2403
13. Davila-Flores D, Villasante-Villalta C, Montesinos-Segura R, Zúñiga-Meza J, Peralta-Santos H, Vera-Talledo L. Anillo vascular tipo doble arco aórtico como causa de estridor y disfagia en la infancia: reporte de caso. Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2025;6(4):253-7. doi: 10.47487/apcyccv.v6i4.534
14. Berdon WE, Baker DH, Wung JT, Chrispin A, Kozlowski K, de Silva M, et al. Complete cartilage-ring tracheal stenosis associated with anomalous left pulmonary artery: the ring-sling complex. Radiology. 1984;152(1):57-64. doi: 10.1148/radiology.152.1.6729137
15. Ho SY, Wilcox BR, Anderson RH, Lincoln JCR. Interrupted aortic arch--anatomical features of surgical significance. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;31(4):199-205. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021980
16. Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Okada Y, Vijay P, Rodefeld MD, Turrentine MW. Outcomes in patients with interrupted aortic arch and associated anomalies: a 20-year experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29(5):666-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.01.060
17. Backer CL, Mongé MC, Popescu AR, Eltayeb OM, Rastatter JC, Rigsby CK. Vascular rings. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016;25(3):165-75. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.02.009
18. Bae SB, Kang EJ, Choo KS, Lee J, Kim SH, Lim KJ, et al. Aortic arch variants and anomalies: embryology, imaging findings, and clinical considerations. J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;30(4):231-62. doi: 10.4250/jcvi.2022.0058
19. Axt-Fliedner R, Nazar A, Bedei I, Schenk J, Reitz M, Rupp S, et al. Associated anomalies and outcome in patients with prenatal diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies as aberrant right subclavian artery, right aortic arch and double aortic arch. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(3):238. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14030238
20. Cohen J, Asrani P, Lee S, Frush D, Han BK, Chelliah A, et al. Cardiovascular computed tomography in pediatric congenital heart disease: a state of the art review. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2022;16(6):467-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2022.04.004
21. Dillman JR, Attili AK, Agarwal PP, Dorfman AL, Hernandez RJ, Strouse PJ. Common and uncommon vascular rings and slings: a multi-modality review. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(11):1440-54; quiz 1489-90. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2131-2
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Investigación e Innovación Clínica y Quirúrgica Pediátrica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
