Use of 3D printing in pediatric neurosurgery: a narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59594/iicqp.2026.v4n1.168Keywords:
Three-Dimensional Printing, Anatomical Models, Neurosurgery, Pediatrics, Neurosurgical ProceduresAbstract
Objective: To analyze the applications of 3D printing in pediatric neurosurgery, particularly in preoperative planning, surgical simulation and training, and cranial reconstruction using customized implants.
Methods: A narrative review of the scientific literature was conducted. The search was performed on January 20, 2026, in the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, including studies published between 2016 and 2025 without language restriction. Studies on the use of 3D printing in pediatric neurosurgery were considered. Technical development and validation studies, case series, and case reports were included. A total of 5 studies were selected.
Results: The included studies described applications of 3D printing in the preoperative planning of complex spinal deformities and orbital approaches, the development of anatomical simulators for training in minimally invasive procedures, and the fabrication of customized implants for the reconstruction of cranial defects.
Conclusions: 3D printing has promising applications in pediatric neurosurgery for surgical planning, surgeon training, and personalized cranial reconstruction. However, its implementation may be limited by technological requirements, costs, and manufacturing times.
Downloads
References
1. Cao J, Zhang X, Liu H, Yao Z, Bai Y, Guo D, et al. 3D printed templates improve the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in the treatment of pediatric congenital scoliosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):1014. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04892-4
2. Nallet J, Hild O, Chaussy Y. The Role of 3D Printing in Pediatric Surgical Care: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 2025;17(9):e91839. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91839
3. Yang A, Panchendrabose K, Leong C, Raza SS, Joharifard S. The utility of three-dimensional modeling and printing in pediatric surgical patient and family education: a systematic review. 3D Print Med. 2024;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41205-023-00198-4
4. Cheng D, Yuan M, Perera I, O’Connor A, Evins AI, Imahiyerobo T, et al. Developing a 3D composite training model for cranial remodeling. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019;24(6):632-41. doi: 10.3171/2019.6.PEDS18773
5. Jiménez Ormabera B, Díez Valle R, Zaratiegui Fernández J, Llorente Ortega M, Unamuno Iñurritegui X, Tejada Solís S. Impresión 3D en neurocirugía: modelo específico para pacientes con craneosinostosis. Neurocirugía. 2017;28(6):260-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neucir.2017.05.001
6. Gómez Pimentel P, Martinez Zerón V, Ponce de León FC, Gordillo Dominguez LF. Planificación Quirúrgica con Modelos 3D en Craneosinostosis Compleja: Un Caso Clínico. Cienc Lat Rev Científica Multidiscip. 2025;9(3):10431-41. doi: 10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i3.18769
7. Katiyar P, Boddapati V, Coury J, Roye B, Vitale M, Lenke L. Three-Dimensional Printing Applications in Pediatric Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. Glob Spine J. 2024;14(2):718-30. doi: 10.1177/21925682231182341
8. Łajczak PM, Jóźwik K, Jaldin Torrico C. Current Applications of the Three-Dimensional Printing Technology in Neurosurgery: A Review. J Neurol Surg Part Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2025;86(3):304-20. doi: 10.1055/a-2389-5207
9. Dzierżanowska N, Krakowiak M, Sokal P, Myszkowska B. The application of 3D printing in neurosurgery: present and future. Eur J Transl Clin Med. 2023;6(1):70-8. doi: 10.31373/ejtcm/158565
10. Martínez Quiñones JV, Orduna Martínez J, Pinilla Arias D, Bernal Lecina M, Consolini Rossi F, Arregui Calvo R. Systematic review of the utility and limits of 3D printing in spine surgery. Neurocir Engl Ed. 2024;35(1):30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neucie.2023.07.003
11. Randazzo M, Pisapia JM, Singh N, Thawani JP. 3D printing in neurosurgery: A systematic review. Surg Neurol Int. 2016;7:S801-9. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.194059
12. Facco G, Palmisani R, Pieralisi M, Forcellese A, Martiniani M, Specchia N, et al. Case series of four complex spinal deformities: new frontiers in pre-operative planning. Acta Biomed. 2022;93(5):e2022221. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i5.12839
13. Sulin KA, Ivanov VP, Kim AV, Khachatryan VA, Samochernykh KA. [3D modeling for planning of minimally invasive approach to the orbit]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2022;86(2):103-8. doi: 10.17116/neiro202286021103
14. London NR, Rangel GG, VanKoevering K, Zhang A, Powell AR, Prevedello DM, et al. Simulation of Pediatric Anterior Skull Base Anatomy Using a 3D Printed Model. World Neurosurg. 2021;147:e405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.077
15. Weinstock P, Rehder R, Prabhu SP, Forbes PW, Roussin CJ, Cohen AR. Creation of a novel simulator for minimally invasive neurosurgery: fusion of 3D printing and special effects. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;20(1):1-9. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.PEDS16568
16. Sulin KA, Ivanov VP, Kim AV, Khachatryan VA. [Skull defect repair in children using a 3D-printing technology]. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko. 2020;84(6):67-75. doi: 10.17116/neiro20208406167
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Investigación e Innovación Clínica y Quirúrgica Pediátrica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

