Similarity analysis policy

The journal uses Turnitin similarity detection software as part of its editorial process. Similarity screening is conducted at two stages: during the initial preliminary editorial assessment by the scientific editor and prior to the generation of the page proof, once the manuscript has been approved for publication.

The journal does not establish a maximum similarity percentage as an automatic rejection criterion. Each similarity report is assessed individually by the assigned scientific editor, who evaluates the context, nature, and extent of the detected overlaps.

If relevant or potentially problematic similarities are identified, the corresponding author is first contacted to provide clarification or explanation. The Editorial Committee will then assess the case in accordance with the guidelines and flowcharts of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) for handling suspected plagiarism.

Editorial decisions are based on a qualitative and contextual evaluation of the manuscript, rather than solely on a numerical similarity percentage.