Opportunities for publication in open access pediatric journals in Latin America

Oportunidades de Publicación en Revistas Pediátricas de Acceso Abierto en América Latina

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Cender U. Quispe-Juli
Abstract

Objective: To explore the available options of Latin American pediatric journals in which open access articles can be published. Methodology: A descriptive observational study of Scopus-indexed journals was conducted for the year 2023. The country of the publisher, open access publishing option, management of proprietary copyright, license for sharing, languages of publication, and associated publication costs were examined. In addition, their positioning was evaluated according to the Scimago Journal Rank quartile and H-index. Results: The journals are concentrated in five countries, with the majority in Brazil (4/10) and Mexico (3/10). 90% (9/10) of the journals had open access editorial policies, of which 66.6% (6/9) were diamond open access. Only one of the journals allowed authors to retain proprietary copyright, but 80% (8/10) used the Creative Commons license. 40% (4/10) of the journals published articles exclusively in English, while only 20% (2/10) published an article in two languages simultaneously. Three journals charged article processing fees. Half of the journals were positioned in the third quartile of Scimago Journal Rank, and the median H-index was 12.5 (IQR: 7–21). Conclusion: The majority of pediatric journals in Latin America are open access, without associated publication costs, although there is some inequality in the geographic and linguistic distribution of publications. Journals should improve their visibility and positioning to be more attractive to readers and researchers.

Keywords

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Author Biography / See

Cender U. Quispe-Juli, Sub Unidad de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica, Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño San Borja, Lima, Perú

Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú

References

Björk BC. Open access to scientific articles: a review of benefits and challenges. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12(2):247–53.

Ellingson MK, Shi X, Skydel JJ, Nyhan K, Lehman R, Ross JS, et al. Publishing at Any Cost: A Cross Sectional Study of the Amount That Medical Researchers Spend on Open Access Publishing Each Year. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e047107

Suber P. Ensuring open access for publicly funded research. BMJ. 2012;345:e5184. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5184

Krauskopf E. Article processing charge expenditure in Chile: The current situation. Learn Publ. 2021;34(4):637–46. doi: 10.1002/leap.1413

Abdul-Baki MN, Alhaj-Hussein M. The impact of article processing charge waiver on conducting research in low-income countries. Confl Health. 2021;15(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13031-021-00413-1

Machin-Mastromatteo JD, Tennant, J. Open science, open access and Latin America: a short conversation with Jon Tennant. Digital Library Perspectives, 2020;36(2):207-210. doi: 10.1108/DLP 05-2020-051

Scopus [Internet]. Ámsterdam: Elsevier; 2002. [citado el 14 de marzo de 2023]. Disponible en: www.scopus.com

Scimagojr [Internet]. Granda: SCImago Research Group; 2002. [14 de marzo de 2023]. Disponible en: www.scimagojr.com

Sobre las licencias [Internet]. California: Creative Commons; 2002. [citado el 22 de mayo de 2023]. Disponible en: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/

Pereira-Da-Costa M, Lima-Leite FC. Open access in the world and Latin America: A review since the Budapest Open Access Initiative. TransInformação. 2016;28(1):33-45. doi:10.1590/231808892016002800003

Besançon L, Peiffer-Smadja N, Segalas C, Jiang H, Masuzzo P, Smout C, et al. Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2021;21(1):117. doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y

Di-Bitetti MS, Ferreras JA. Publish (in English) or perish: The effecton citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications. Ambio. 2017;46(1):121-7. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0820-7

Ramírez-Castañeda V. Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0238372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238372

Van Calster B, Wynants L, Riley RD, van Smeden M, Collins GS. Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;138:219-26. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.018

Saginur M, Fergusson D, Zhang T, Yeates K, Ramsay T, Wells G, et al. Journal impact factor, trial effect size, and methodological quality appear scantly related: a systematic review and meta analysis. Syst Rev. 2020;9(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01305-w

Ioannidis JPA, Pezzullo AM, Boccia S. The Rapid Growth of MegaJournals: Threats and Opportunities. JAMA. 2023;329(15):1253-4. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.3212

Aczel B, Szaszi B, Holcombe AO. A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers' time spent on peer review. Res Integr Peer Rev.2021;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s41073-021-00118-2

Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G, Karimi R. Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quant Sci Stud. 2020;1(1):377 86. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00019

OJS System - Metabiblioteca |